Concerning Dr. Charles Northen: “This quiet, unballyhooed pioneer and
genius in the field of nutrition demonstrates that countless human ills
stem
from the fact that impoverished soil of America no longer provides plant
foods
with the mineral elements essential to human nourishment and health! To
overcome this alarming condition, he doctors sick soils and, by seeming
miracles, raises truly healthy and health-giving fruits and vegetables.”
- Rex Beach
Do you know that most of us today are suffering from certain dangerous
diet
deficiencies which cannot be remedied until the depleted soils from which
our
foods come are brought into proper mineral balance? The alarming fact is
that
foods--fruits and vegetables and grains--now being raised on millions of
acres
of land that no longer contains enough of certain needed minerals, are
starving us--no matter how much of them we eat! This talk about minerals
is
novel and quite startling. In fact, a realization of the importance of
minerals in
food is so new that the textbooks on nutritional dietetics contain very
little
about it. Nevertheless, it is something that concerns all of us, and the
further
we delve into it the more startling it becomes.
You would think, wouldn’t you; that a carrot is a carrot--that one is about
as
good as another as far as nourishment is concerned? But it isn’t; one carrot
may look and taste like another and yet be lacking in the particular mineral
element which our system requires and which carrots are supposed to
contain. Laboratory tests prove that the fruits, the vegetables, the grains,
the
eggs and even the milk and the meats of today are not what they were a
few
generations ago. (Which doubtless explains why our forefathers thrived
on a
selection of foods that would starve us!) No man of today can eat enough
fruits and vegetables to supply his system with the mineral salts he requires
for perfect health, because his stomach isn’t big enough to hold them!
And
we are running to big stomachs.
No longer does a balanced and fully nourishing diet consist merely of so
many calories or certain vitamins or a fixed proportion of starches, proteins,
and carbohydrates. We now know that it must contain, in addition,
something like a score of mineral salts.
It is bad news to learn from our leading authorities that 99 percent of
the
American people are deficient in these minerals, and that a marked
deficiency in any one of the more important minerals actually results in
disease. Any upset of the balance, any considerable lack of one or another
element, however microscopic the body requirement may be, and we sicken,
suffer, shorten our lives.
This discovery is one of the latest and most important contributions of
science to the problem of human health. So far as the records go, the first
man in the field of research, the first to demonstrate that most human
foods
of our day are poor in minerals and that their proportions are not balanced,
was Dr. Charles Northen, an Alabama physician now living in Orlando,
Florida. His discoveries and achievements are of enormous importance to
mankind.
Following a wide experience in general practice, Dr. Northen specialized
in
stomach diseases and nutritional disorders. Later he moved to New York
and
made extensive studies along this line, in conjunction with a famous French
scientist from the Sorbonne. In the course of that work, he convinced himself
that there was little authentic, definite information on the chemistry
of foods
and that no dependence could be placed on existing data.
He asked himself how foods could be used intelligently in the treatment
of
disease, when they differed so widely in content. The answer seemed to
be
that they could not be used intelligently. In establishing the fact that
serious
deficiencies existed and in searching out the reasons therefore, he made
an
extensive study of the soil. It was he who first voiced the surprising
assertion
that we must make soil building the basis of food building in order to
accomplish human building.
“Bear in mind,” says Dr. Northen, “that minerals are vital to human
metabolism and health--and that no plant or animal can appropriate to itself
any mineral which is not present in the soil upon which it feeds.
“When I first made this statement I was ridiculed, for up to that time,
people
had paid little attention to food deficiencies and even less to soil deficiencies.
Men eminent in medicine denied there was any such thing as vegetables and
fruits that did not contain sufficient minerals for human needs. Eminent
agricultural authorities insisted that all soil contained all the necessary
minerals. They reasoned that plants take what they need, and that is the
function of the human body to appropriate what it requires. Failure to
do so,
they said, was a symptom of disorder.
"Some of our respected authorities even claimed that the so-called
secondary minerals played no part whatever in human health. It is only
recently that such men as Dr. McCollum of Johns Hopkins, Dr. Mendel of
Yale, Dr. Sherman of Columbia, Dr. Lipman of Rutgers, and Drs. H.G. Knight
and Oswald Schreiner of the Untied States Department of Agriculture have
agreed that these minerals are essential to plant, animal, and human feeding.
“We know that vitamins are complex chemical substances which are
indispensable to nutrition, and that each of them is of importance for
the
normal function of some special structure in the body. Disorder and disease
result from any vitamin deficiency. “It is not commonly realized, however,
that
vitamins control the body’s appropriation of minerals, and in the absence
of
minerals they have no function to perform. Lacking vitamins, the system
can
make some use of minerals, but lacking minerals, vitamins are useless.
“Neither does the layman realize that there may be a pronounced difference
in both foods and soils - to him one vegetable, one glass of milk, or one
egg
is about the same as another. Dirt is dirt, too, and he assumes that by
adding a little fertilizer to it, a satisfactory vegetable or fruit can
be grown.
“The truth is that our foods vary enormously in value, and some of them
aren’t
worth eating, as food. For example, vegetation grown in one part of the
country may assay 1,100 parts per billion of iodine, as against 20 in that
grown elsewhere. Processed milk has run anywhere from 362 parts per
million of iodine and 127 of iron, down to nothing.
“Some of our lands, even in a virgin state, never were well balanced in
mineral
content, and unhappily for us, we have been systematically robbing the
poor
soils and the good soils alike of the very substances most necessary to
health, growth, long life, and resistance to disease.” Up to the time I
began
experimenting, almost nothing had been done to make good the theft. “The
more I studied nutritional problems and the effects of mineral deficiencies
upon disease, the more plainly I saw that here lay the most direct approach
to better health, and the more important it became in my mind to find a
method of restoring those missing minerals to our foods.
“The subject interested me so profoundly that I retired from active medical
practice and for a good many years now I have devoted myself to it. It's
a
fascinating subject, for it goes to the heart of human betterment.”
The results obtained by Dr. Northen are outstanding. By putting back into
the
foods the stuff that foods are made of, he has proved himself to be a real
miracle man of medicine, for he has opened up the shortest and most
rational route to better health. He showed first that it should be done,
and
then that it could be done. He doubled and redoubled the natural mineral
content of fruits and vegetables. He improved the quality of milk by increasing
the iron and the iodine in it. He caused hens to lay eggs richer in the
vital
elements. By scientific soil feeding, he raised better seed potatoes in
Maine,
better grapes in California, better oranges in Florida and better field
crops in
other states. (By “better” is meant not only improvement in food value
but
also an increase in quality and quantity.)
Before going further into the results he has obtained, let's see just what
is
involved in this matter of “mineral deficiencies,” what it may mean to
our
health, and how it may affect the growth and development, both mental and
physical, of our children. We know that rats, guinea pigs, and other animals
can be fed into a diseased condition and out again by controlling only
the
minerals in their food.
A 10-year test with rats proved that by withholding calcium they can be
bred
down to a third the size of those fed with an adequate amount of that mineral.
Their intelligence, too, can be controlled by mineral feeding as readily
as can
their size, their bony structure, and their general health.
Place a number of these little animals inside a maze after starving some
of
them in a certain mineral element. The starved ones will be unable to find
their way out, whereas the others will have little or no difficulty in
getting out.
Their dispositions can be altered by mineral feeding. They can be made
quarrelsome and belligerent; they can even be turned into cannibals and
be
made to devour each other.
A cage of normal rats will live in amity. Restrict their calcium, and they
will
become irritable and draw apart from one another. Then they will begin
to
fight. Restore their calcium balance and they will grow more friendly;
in time
they will begin to sleep in a pile as before. Many backward children are
“stupid” merely because they are deficient in magnesia. We punish them
for
our failure to feed them properly.
Certainly our physical well-being is more directly dependent upon the
minerals we take into our systems than upon calories or vitamins or upon
the
precise proportions of starch, protein, or carbohydrates we consume.
It is now agreed that at least 16 mineral elements are indispensable for
normal nutrition, and several more are always found in small amounts in
the
body, although their precise physiological role has not been determined.
Of
the 16 indispensable salts, calcium, phosphorus, and iron are perhaps the
most important.
Calcium is the most dominant nerve controller; it powerfully affects the
cell
formation of all living things and regulates nerve action. It governs contractility
of the muscles and the rhythmic beat of the heart. It also coordinates
the
other mineral elements and corrects disturbances made by them. It works
only in sunlight. Vitamin D is its buddy. Dr. Sherman of Columbia asserts
that 50 percent of the American people are starving for calcium. A recent
article in the Journal of the American Medical Association stated that
out of
4,000 cases in New York Hospital, only 2 were not suffering from a lack
of
calcium.
What does such a deficiency mean? How would it affect your health or mine?
So many morbid conditions and actual diseases may result that it is almost
hopeless to catalog them. Included in the list are rickets, bony deformities,
bad teeth, nervous disorders, reduced resistance to other diseases,
fatigability, and behavior disturbances such as incorrigibility, assaultiveness
and nonadaptability.
Here’s one specific example: The soil around a certain Midwest city is
poor
in calcium. Three hundred children in this community were examined and
nearly 90 percent had bad teeth, swollen glands, enlarged or diseased
tonsils. More than one-third had defective vision, round shoulders, bow
legs,
and anemia.
Calcium and phosphorus appear to pull in double harness. A child requires
as much per day as two grown men, but studies indicate a common
deficiency of one or the other as the cause of serious losses to the farmers,
and when the soil is poor in phosphorous their animals become
bone-chewers. Dr. McCollum says that when there are enough phosphates in
the blood there can be no dental decay.
Iron is an essential constituent of the oxygen-carrying pigment of the
blood:
iron starvation results in anemia, and yet iron cannot be assimilated unless
some copper is contained in the diet. In Florida, many cattle die from
an
obscure disease called “salt sickness.” It has been found to arise from
a lack
of iron and copper in the soil and hence the grass. A man may starve for
want of these elements just as a beef “critter” starves.
If iodine is not present in our foods the function of the thyroid gland
is
disturbed and goiter afflicts us. The human body requires only
fourteen-thousandths of a milligram daily, yet we have a distinct “goiter
belt”
in the Great Lakes section, and in parts of the Northwest the soil is so
poor
in iodine that the disease is common.
So it goes, down through the list, each mineral element playing a definite
roll
in nutrition. A characteristic set of symptoms, just as specific as any
vitamin-deficiency disease, follows a deficiency in any one of them. It
is
alarming, therefore, to face the fact that we are starving for these precious,
health-giving substances.
Very well, you say, if our foods are poor in the mineral salts they are
supposed to contain, why not resort to dosing?
That is precisely what is being done, or being attempted. However, those
who
should know assert that the human system cannot appropriate those
elements to the best advantage in any but the food form. At best, only
a part
of them in the form of drugs can be utilized by the body, and certain
dieticians go so far as to say it is a waste of effort to fool with them.
Calcium,
for instance, cannot be supplied in any form of medication with lasting
effect.
But there is a more potent reason why the curing of diet deficiencies by
drugging hasn't worked out so well. Consider those 16 indispensable
elements and those others which presumably perform some obscure function
as yet understood. Aside from calcium and phosphorous, they are needed
only in infinitesimal quantities, and the activity of one may be dependent
upon the presence of another. To determine the precise requirements of
each
individual case and to attempt to weigh it out on a druggist's scale would
appear hopeless.
It is a problem and a serious one. But here is the hopeful side of the
picture:
Nature can and will solve it if she is encouraged to do so. The minerals
in fruit
and vegetables are colloidal; i.e. they are in a state of such extremely
fine
suspension that they can be assimilated by the human system: It is merely
a question of giving back to nature the materials with which she works.
We must rebuild our soils: Put back the minerals we have taken out. That
sounds difficult but it isn't. Neither is it expensive. Therein lies the
short cut
to better health and longer life.
When Dr. Northen first asserted that many foods were lacking in mineral
content and that this deficiency was due solely to an absence of those
elements in the soil, his findings were challenged and he was called a
crank.
But differences of opinion in the medical profession are not uncommon -
it
was only 60 years ago that the Medical Society of Boston passed a
resolution commending the use of bathtubs - and he persisted in his
assertion that inasmuch as foods did not contain what they were supposed
to contain, no physician could with certainty prescribe a diet to overcome
physical ills.
He showed that the textbooks are not dependable because many of the
analyses in them were made many years ago, perhaps from products raised
in virgin soils, whereas our soils have been constantly depleted. Soil
analyses, he pointed out, reflect only the content of samples. One analysis
may be entirely different from another made ten miles away.
“And so what?” came the query.
Dr. Northen undertook to demonstrate that something could be done about
it.
By re-establishing a proper soil balance he actually grew crops that
contained an ample amount of desired minerals.
This was incredible. It was contrary to the books and it upset everything
connected with diet practice. The scoffers began to pay attention to him.
Recently, the Southern Medical Association, realizing the hopelessness
of
trying to remedy nutritional deficiencies without positive factors to work
with,
recommended a careful study to determine the real mineral content of
foodstuffs and the variations due to soil depletion in different localities.
These
progressive medical men are awake to the importance of prevention.
Dr. Northen went even further and proved that crops grown in a properly
mineralized soil were bigger and better; that seeds germinated quicker,
grew
more rapidly and made larger plants; that trees were healthier and put
on
more fruit of better quality. By increasing the mineral content of citrus
fruit he
likewise improved its texture, its appearance and its flavor.
He experimented with a variety of growing things, and in every case the
story
was the same. By mineralizing the feed at poultry farms, he got more and
better eggs; by balancing pasture soils, he produced richer milk. Persistently
he hammered home to farmers, to doctors, and to the general public the
thought that life depends upon the minerals!
His work led him into a careful study of the effects of climate, sunlight,
ultraviolet and thermal rays upon plant, animal and human hygiene. In
consequence he moved to Florida. People familiar with his work consider
him
the most valuable man in the state. I met him by reason of the fact that
I was
harassed by certain soil problems on my Florida farm which had baffled
the
best chemists and fertilizer experts available.
He is an elderly, retiring man, with a warm smile and an engaging
personality. He is a trifle shy until he opens up on his pet topic; then
his
difference disappears and he speaks with authority. His mind is a storehouse
crammed with precise, scientific data about soil and food chemistry, the
complicated life processes of plants, animals, and human beings - and the
effect of malnutrition upon all three. He is perhaps as close to the secret
of
life as any man anywhere. “Do you call yourself a soil a or a food chemist?”
I
inquired.
“Neither. I am an M.D. My works lie in the field of biochemistry an nutrition.
I
gave up medicine because this is a wider and a more important work. Sick
soils mean sick plants, sick animals, and sick people. Physical, mental,
and
moral fitness depends largely upon an ample supply and a proper proportion
of the minerals in our foods. Nerve function, nerve stability, nerve cell-building
likewise depend thereon. I'm really a doctor of sick soils.”
“Do you mean to imply that the vegetables I'm raising on my farm are sick?”
I
asked.
“Precisely! They're as weak and undernourished as anemic children. They're
not much good as food. Look at the pests and the diseases that plague
them. Insecticides cost farmers nearly as much as fertilizer these days.
“A healthy plant, however, grown in soil properly balanced, can and will
resist
most insect pests. That very characteristic makes it a better food product.
You have tuberculosis and pneumonia germs in your system but you're
strong enough to throw them off. Similarly, a really healthy plant will
pretty
nearly take care of itself in the battle against insects and blights -
and will
also give the human system what it requires.”
“Good heavens! Do you realize what that means to agriculture?”
“Perfectly. Enormous savings. Better crops. Lowered living costs to the
rest
of us. But I'm not so much interested in agriculture as in health.”
“It sounds beautifully theoretical and utterly impractical to me,” I told
the
doctor, whereupon he gave me some of his case records.
For instance, in an orange grove infested with scale, when he restored
the
mineral balance to part of the soil, the trees growing in that part became
clean while the rest remained diseased. By the same means he had grown
healthy rosebushes between rows that were riddled by insects.
He has grown tomato and cucumber plants, both healthy and diseased,
where the vines intertwined. The bugs ate up the diseased and refused to
touch the healthy plants! He showed me interesting analyses of citrus fruits
the chemistry and the food value of which accurately reflected the soil
treatment the trees had received.
There is no space here to go fully into Dr. Northen's work but it is of
such
importance as to rank with that of Burbank, the plant wizard, and with
that of
our famous physiologists and nutritional experts.
“Healthy plants mean healthy people,” said he. “We can't raise a strong
race
on a weak soil. Why don't you try mending the deficiencies on your farm
and
growing more minerals into your crop?”
I did try and I succeeded. I was planting a large acreage of celery and
under
Dr. Northen's direction I fed minerals into certain blocks of land in varying
amounts. When the plants from this soil were mature I had them analyzed,
along with celery from other parts of the state. It was the most careful
and
comprehensive study of the kind ever made, and it included over 250
separate chemical determinations. I was amazed to learn that my celery
had
more than twice the mineral content of the best grown elsewhere.
Furthermore, it kept much better, with and without refrigeration, proving
that
the cell structure was sounder.
In 1927, Mr. W.W. Kincaid, a “gentleman farmer” of Niagara Falls, heard
an
address by Dr. Northen and was so impressed that he began extensive
animals. The results he has accomplished are conspicuous. He set himself
the task of increasing the iodine in the milk from his dairy herd. He has
succeeded in adding both iodine and iron so liberally that one glass of
his
milk contains all of these minerals that an adult male requires for a day.
Is this significant? Listen to these incredible figures taken from a bulletin
of
the South Carolina Food Research Commission: “In many sections three out
of five persons have goiter and a recent estimate states that 30 million
people
in the United States suffer from it.”
Foods rich in iodine are of the greatest importance to these sufferers.
Mr. Kincaid took a brown Swiss heifer calf which was dropped in the
stockyards, and by raising her on mineralized pasturage and a properly
balanced diet made her the third all-time champion of her breed! In one
season she gave 21,924 pounds of milk. He raised her butterfat production
to
410 pounds in 1 year to 1,037 pounds. Results like these are of incalculable
importance.
Others besides Mr. Kincaid are following the trail Dr. Northen blazed.
Similar
experiments with milk have been made in Illinois and nearly every fertilizer
company is beginning to urge use of the rare mineral elements. As an
example I quote from statements of a subsidiary of one of the leading copper
companies:
Many states show a marked reduction in the productive capacity of the
soil…in many districts amounting to a 25 to 50 percent reduction in the
last
50 years…Some areas show a tenfold variation in calcium. Some show a
sixty-fold variation in phosphorous... Authorities…see soil depletion,
barren
livestock, increased human death rate due to heart disease, deformities,
arthritis, increased dental caries, all due to lack of essential minerals
in plant
foods.
“It is neither a complicated nor an expensive undertaking to restore our
soils
to balance and thereby work a real miracle in the control of disease,”
says
Dr. Northen. “As a matter of fact, it's a money-making move for the farmer,
and any competent soil chemist can tell him how to proceed.
“First determine by analysis the precise chemistry of any given soil, then
correct the deficiencies by putting down enough of the missing elements
to
restore its balance. The same care should be used as in prescribing for
a
sick patient, for proportions are of vital importance.
“In my early experiments I found it extremely difficult to get the variety
of
minerals needed in the form in which I wanted to use them but advancement
in chemistry, and especially our ever-increasing knowledge of colloidal
chemistry, has solved that difficulty. It is now possible, by the use of
minerals in colloidal form, to prescribe a cheap and effective system of
soil
correction which meets this vital need and one which fits in admirably
with
nature's plans.
“Soils seriously deficient in minerals cannot produce plant life competent
to
maintain our needs, and with the continuous cropping and shipping away
of
those concentrates, the condition becomes worse.
“A famous nutrition authority recently said, ‘One sure way to end the
American people’s susceptibility to infection is to supply through food
a
balanced ration or iron, copper, and other metals. An organism supplied
with
a diet adequate to, or preferably in excess of, all mineral requirements
may
so utilize these elements as to produce immunity from infection quite beyond
anything we are able to produce artificially by our present method of
immunization. You can’t make up the deficiency by using patent medicine.’”
He's absolutely right. Prevention of disease is easier, more practical,
and
more economical than cure, but not until foods are standardized on a basis
of
what they contain instead of what they look like can the dietician prescribe
them with intelligence and with effect.
There was a time when medical therapy had no standards because the
therapeutic elements in drugs had not been definitely determined on a
chemical basis. Pharmaceutical houses have charged all that. Food
chemistry, on the other hand, has depended almost entirely upon
governmental agencies for its research, and in our real knowledge of values
we are about where medicine was a century ago.
Disease preys most surely and most viciously on the undernourished and
unfit plants, animals, and human beings alike, and when the importance
of
these obscure mineral elements is fully realized the chemistry of life
will have
to be written. No man knows his mental or bodily capacity, how well he
can
feel or how long he can live, for we are all cripples and weaklings. It
is a
disgrace to science. Happily, that chemistry is being rewritten and we're
on
our way to better health by returning to the soil the things we have stolen
from it.
The public can help; it can hasten the change. How? By demanding quality
of
food. By insisting that our doctors and our health departments establish
scientific standards of nutritional value. The growers will quickly respond.
They can put back those minerals almost overnight and by doing so they
can
actually make money through bigger and better crops. It is simpler to cure
sick soils than sick people - which shall we choose?”
For information on concentrated ionic (water soluble) minerals, click
HERE.