951-303-6067 Another AIDS-like disease is spreading among GIs who served in the Persian Gulf War, which ended in 1991. The military is not releasing the actual number of soldiers who have contracted the disease, and the number of veterans who have died from the disease is unknown. Reports
of a mystery illness occurring in Gulf vets first surfaced in the spring
of 1992. About sixty Army
reservists from the Indianapolis, Indiana area, who had been perfectly
well while fighting in the
Gulf, became ill after returning home. Their symptoms were puzzling.
By the
summer of 1992 new cases of the mystery disease were popping up in other
reservists, as
well as enlisted personnel,
living
The sick soldiers were convinced that something had happened to them in the Gulf that was causing their disease. There was speculation that toxic fumes from the Kuwait oil fires, or diesel fluid in the shower water might be the cause. Other soldiers blamed biological warfare agents released by Saddam Hussein. As early as 1992 there were rumors that spouses of Persian Gulf vets were also coming down with symptoms. Wives were experiencing an alarming number of miscarriages and birth defects in their babies.
Army physicians investigating the initial breakout among Indian reservists
concluded that the vets were
suffering from “stress,” perhaps caused by readjustment back into civilian
life. Interviewed by
reporter Lyn Sherr of 20/20, one sick reservist complained that “when people
were coming back from
Vietnam, wringing Agent Orange out of their clothes, they were told they
were under stress.
By 1993, it was estimated that 8000 vets were fighting the illness. People
magazine (30/8/93) interviewed
Indiana Congressman Steve Buyer, age 34, who developed respiratory symptoms
and repeated
episodes of the flu after coming home from the Gulf in May 1991.
A Los Angeles Times report (22/11/93) noted that soldiers were also coming down with cancer. The Times claimed that 600 vets with symptoms had already been examined at the Birmingham VA Medical Center, and 110 additional patients were awaiting appointments. When questioned, Pentagon officials estimated the total number of cases was “in the low thousands.” One Alabama veteran said that up to two-thirds of all reserve units have members who have come home sick. Reservist William Kay believes his illness is due to an Iraqi Scud missile “loaded with chemical agents, nerve gas, and a man-made virus.” He thinks there is a cover-up, and he is angry that he has to fight another war with the federal government. Suspicion
that chemical warfare agents might be involved was strengthened by Defense
Secretary Les
Aspin, who admitted that low levels
A special
Capitol Hill hearing on the matter convened on November 9, 1993. About
fifty ill vets,
By 1994,
military officials admitted that as many as 20,000 (about 3%) or more of
the 700,000
A Los Angeles Times editorial (May 10, 1994) drew attention to experimental and unapproved vaccines and drugs that were given to all personnel who fought in the Gulf War. These vaccines and drugs were prescribed to protect soldiers against anthrax and a nerve disease called myothenia gravis, as well as for protection against other biological warfare agents that might be used by enemy forces. “In an effort to protect the health and lives of uniformed personnel, the U.S. military may have inadvertently done some of them serious injury,” the Times concluded.
In a letter to the Times, VA doctor Basil Clyman admitted that “many Gulf
War personnel were exposed
inadvertently or otherwise to a variety of potentially toxic agents, some
of which were administered
in hopes of protecting them from still worse toxicities, namely those posed
by
On May 25, 1994, an official Pentagon letter sent to all Persian Gulf Veterans declared: “There is no information, classified and unclassified, that indicated chemical or biological weapons were used in the Persian Gulf.” However, the Pentagon did admit that experimental vaccines may have led to some veterans’ symptoms. Coinciding with the Pentagon letter was the release of a 160-page congressional report based on testimony of 30 ill vets. The report reaffirmed that vets were exposed to chemical agents, mostly from Iraqi rocket attacks, on more than a dozen occasions in the Gulf. A month later, a Pentagon panel concluded that “the syndrome may be a group of diseases caused by wartime stress, inhaling fine Kuwaiti sand or alcohol deprivation, among other causes.” (Los Angeles Times, 24/6/94). Finally, in July 1994, Congress authorized a bill to compensate sick Persian Gulf War vets. Disability payments would be paid for three years with automatic extensions, if, at the end of that period, the cause of the syndrome is still not determined. In November 1994, news reports stressed the growing fear and concern that the syndrome was trans-missable. However, Pentagon spokesman Dennis Boxx urged caution. “We do not have anyindication at this point that these things are transmittable to children or spouses, but we have not ruled out this possibility. We simply cannot, because if we cannot diagnose it and describe what it is, we then cannot tell you that it is not transmittable.” Adding to the controversy were wives who complained about miscarriages and “burning semen” after sex with their husbands. Dr. Ellen Silbergeld, a toxicologist at the University of Maryland, agreed that it is possible for men exposed to toxic chemicals to pass the poison directly to their children through their semen. And genetic alterations due to toxic substances can also cause alterations in sperm cells involved in conception. Vets claim a third of Gulf War babies have abnormalities, ten times the normal rate. Dr. Francis Waickman, an environmental pediatrician, says the syndrome can be passed on, creating an infant whose immune system does not function normally. In the search for a cause of the syndrome, epidemiologists have been searching for a common factor that could have exposed everyone stationed in the Gulf. Some sick vets were in the war zone for months, while other ill vets served in the Gulf for as little as nine days! And the disease has affected troops who were stationed in widely scattered geo- graphic areas in the Gulf. One factor common to all the troops is that they were given experimental drugs and vaccines as part of the requirement to serve in the Gulf. As early as December 1990, there were warnings about experimenting with US troops. There was great concern about the decision of the FDA to allow the Pentagon to use unapproved experimental drugs and vaccines on soldiers without their consent. Furthermore, the Pentagon refused to identify the types or the number of drugs and injections that they intended to prescribe. An angry soldier stationed in Saudi Arabia sued the government in January 1991 over the issue. Ever since the Nuremberg trials, which convicted many top-ranking Nazis for crimes against human nature, it has been considered unethical and unlawful to use people as guinea pigs in medical experiments without their informed consent. This ethical requirement was waived when the soldier’s lawsuit was dismissed by U.S. District Judge Stanley S. Harris. The judge cited the necessity of the military to protect the health of its troops; the fact that the vaccines and drugs were untested and unapproved by the FDA was deemed irrelevant. The New York Times concurred in an editorial entitled “The Ethics of Troop Vaccination” (16/1/91), noting that “the military is acting more like Florence Nightingale than (the Nazi doctor) Josef Mengele.” Soldiers who refused injections were given them forcibly. One reservist told a CovertAction reporter she was held down against her will and given the first vaccination. When the second inoculation was given a few weeks later, she claims someone sneaked up behind her and injected her before she realized what had happened.
Sgt. Frank Landy of Nashua, NH testified before a House Veterans Affairs
Committee on September
21, 1992. He blames two vaccine injections for his respiratory problems,
chronic diarrhea,
extreme fatigue, fevers and weight loss. “The type of substandard medical
care
Physicians who refused to cooperate with the military’s forced vaccine program were treated harshly. Dr. Yolanda Huet-Vaughn, an army reservist, protested that it was her duty under the Nuremberg Code of Justice not to vaccinate personnel with experimental vaccines without her consent. At Huet-Vaughn’s court-martial trial, a military judge ignored these considerations of international law and medical ethics, and sentenced the mother of three children to 30 months in prison. Under pressure from activist groups, the physician was released from prison after serving eight months. Allegations
that experimental drugs and vaccines are the cause of the vets’ illness
have been downplayed
for obvious reasons.
The military has a long history of conducting covert medical experiments on its own personnel, as well as civilians. Dozens of secret, planned bioattacks were perpetrated on American cities during the 1950s and 1960s, the most notorious being a six-day bioattack on San Francisco in which the military sprayed massive clouds of potentially harmful bacteria over the entire city. The health of countless numbers of military personnel and civilians was damaged by years of nuclear bomb detonations at test sites in Nevada and elsewhere in the southwest. In addition, the shocking disclosures of additional post-war nuclear experiments undertaken from the 1950s to the 1980s on unsuspecting civilians has recently come to light with the release of secret documents by the Department of Defense. When mind-altering drugs were developed in the 1950s, the military secretly administered them to enlisted personnel, resulting in deaths in some cases. Physicians play a crucial role in covert and unethical experimentation, as chronicled by Gordon Thomas, author of Journey Into Madness: The True Story of Secret CIA Mind Control and Medical Abuse (1989). Thomas is horrified by the inescapable truth that doctors have tortured and still do. Vaccines can be hazardous. In World War II, more than 50,000 cases of hepatitis were caused when troops were injected with yellow fever vaccine unknowingly contaminated with human blood serum containing infectious hepatitis B virus. Even the mandated “DPT” shot routinely given to babies has known risks. For example, one official DPT brochure recommends that a second DPT injection not be given if “serious problems of the brain have previously occurred within seven days after getting DPT.” The brochure also warns parents, “Rarely, brain damage that lasts for the child’s life has been reported after getting DPT.” Polio vaccines can actually cause polio in rare instances. If serious consequences of compulsory “routine” and “approved” vaccines are freely admitted, what are the health consequences of unapproved, untested, and experimental vaccines? Experimental and non-experimental vaccine inoculation programs can be a surreptitious way of “introducing” harmful infectious agents into unsuspecting people. Some investigators believe that the polio vaccine programs undertaken in the 1950s by the World Health Organization in Africa may have introduced the AIDS virus (HIV) into the black population. The African green monkey is theorized as the source of the AIDS virus, and the polio vaccine was manufactured using kidney cells of the African green monkey.
Others think the World Health Organization’s smallpox vaccine program is
connected to the AIDS outbreak
in Africa.
The “Introduction” of HIV into the homosexual community population in America occurred the same year the hepatitis B vaccine experiment began in 1978 in New York City. In the experiment over a thousand young promiscuous homosexual and bisexual men were used as guinea pigs and injected with the vaccine. A few months after the homosexual experiment began in Manhattan, the first cases of AIDS appeared in a young gay man in Manhattan in 1979. In 1980, thousands of additional gays were injected in subsequent hepatitis B vaccine experiments in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and other US cities.
After the gay experiments ended in 1981, the AIDS epidemic became official.
The mystery disease
was first called “Gay-related immune deficiency disease” because it was
diagnosed exclusively
in young white homosexuals - the same minority group that volunteered for
the
Is the Persian Gulf Syndrome another AIDS Holocaust in the making? Like AIDS, the disease traces back to human experiments with untested and unapproved vaccines. Like AIDS, the Gulf syndrome appears to be transmissible through sexual activity, and can be passed on to children. Like AIDS, the vets’ disease affects the immune system. Like AIDS, there is no cure. Unlike AIDS, health officials are silent about the number of people suffering and dying with the new Gulf syndrome. Nor have officials commented on ways to prevent the sexual spread of the disease. Is the Persian Gulf Syndrome caused by a new infectious agent “introduced” into the military population through forced experimental vaccines? There
is currently no effective treatment or cure for the Gulf Syndrome. If the
disease is caused by
bad vaccines, it would mean that irresponsible scientists have once again
created a man-made disease
they are powerless to eradicate.
“Gulf Reservists Suffer Strange Illnesses,” Los Angeles Times, March 26, 1992. “The unforeseen results
of fighting in the Gulf,” by Walter Goodman. New York Times,
“Gulf vets fear US ‘cop-out’ on baffling ills,” by Bethany Kandel, USA Today, September 16, 1992 “Gulf veterans’ mystery
illness probed by US,” by Richard A Serrano, Los Angeles Times,
“Chemical arms, ailing
Gulf GIs not linked, Aspin says,” Richard A Serrano, Los Angeles Times,
“Study of Gulf veterans’ illnesses urged,” by Marlene Cimons, Los Angeles Times, April 30, 1994. “Heed maladies of Gulf War vets” (Editorial), Los Angeles Times, May 10, 1994. “Pentagon ignored
signs of toxic attacks, report says,” by Jeff Leeds, Los Angeles Times,
“Birth defects In
Gulf vets’ babies stir fear, debate,” by Richard S. Serrano, Los Angeles
Times,
“Guinea pigs & disposable GIs,” by Tod Ensign, CovertAction, Winter 1992-93. “Medication rules altered for Gulf troops,” San Francisco Chronicle, December 22, 1990. “Troops may get unlicensed drug,” by Gina Kolata, New York Times, January 4, 1991. “US sued on drugs given in Gulf,” by Philip J. Hilts, New York Times, January 12, 1991. “The ethics of troop vaccination” (Editorial), New York Times, January 16, 1991. “Our guinea pigs
in the Gulf,” by George J. Anna and Michael A. Grodin, New York Times,
“Troops may be forced to take test drugs,” San Gabriel Valley Times, February 1, 1991. “Origins of HIV,”
in Queer Blood, by Alan Cantwell, Jr. MD, Aries Rising Press, Los Angeles,
“Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus,” by Pearce Wright, London Times, May 11, 1987. “The origin of AIDS:
A startling new theory attempts to answer the questions ‘Was it an act
of God
“Gulf War Syndrome
may be contagious,” by Marlene Cimons, Los Angeles Times, October 21,
______________________________________________________ |